On 02.12.2017 10:15, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/18/2017 08:09 PM, York Sun wrote:
Commit 72443c7f7d21 ("mtd: cfi: Add support for status register
polling") added a feature check to determine if status register
is available for certain flash chips. The "lower software bits"
register used to
On 11/18/2017 08:09 PM, York Sun wrote:
> Commit 72443c7f7d21 ("mtd: cfi: Add support for status register
> polling") added a feature check to determine if status register
> is available for certain flash chips. The "lower software bits"
> register used to determine this feature is not backward
On 11/30/2017 08:23 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 21.11.2017 10:54, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/21/2017 03:52 AM, York Sun wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2017 11:09 AM, York Sun wrote:
Commit 72443c7f7d21 ("mtd: cfi: Add support for status register
polling") added a feature check to determine if
On 21.11.2017 10:54, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/21/2017 03:52 AM, York Sun wrote:
On 11/18/2017 11:09 AM, York Sun wrote:
Commit 72443c7f7d21 ("mtd: cfi: Add support for status register
polling") added a feature check to determine if status register
is available for certain flash chips. The
On 11/21/2017 03:52 AM, York Sun wrote:
> On 11/18/2017 11:09 AM, York Sun wrote:
>> Commit 72443c7f7d21 ("mtd: cfi: Add support for status register
>> polling") added a feature check to determine if status register
>> is available for certain flash chips. The "lower software bits"
>> register
Commit 72443c7f7d21 ("mtd: cfi: Add support for status register
polling") added a feature check to determine if status register
is available for certain flash chips. The "lower software bits"
register used to determine this feature is not backward compati-
ble. Older flash chips without this
6 matches
Mail list logo