When the data has been partially written into the NAND Flash,
returning the written length instead of 0. The written length
may be useful when the upper level decides to continue the writing
after skipping the block causing the write failure.
Signed-off-by: Tao Hou
Cc: Scott Wood
Cc: Ben Gardine
On 03/02/2013 03:01:10 AM, Tao Hou wrote:
When the data has been partially written into the NAND Flash,
returning the written length instead of 0. The written length
may be useful when the upper level decides to continue the writing
after skipping the block causing the write failure.
We already
Hi, Scott
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/02/2013 03:01:10 AM, Tao Hou wrote:
>>
>> When the data has been partially written into the NAND Flash,
>> returning the written length instead of 0. The written length
>> may be useful when the upper lev
On 03/06/2013 08:56:56 AM, htbegin wrote:
Hi, Scott
Thanks for your review.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 03/02/2013 03:01:10 AM, Tao Hou wrote:
>>
>> When the data has been partially written into the NAND Flash,
>> returning the written length instead of 0. The wri
Hi, Scott
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 08:56:56 AM, htbegin wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Scott
>>
>> Thanks for your review.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Scott Wood
>> wrote:
>> > On 03/02/2013 03:01:10 AM, Tao Hou wrote:
>> >>
>> >> When the data has been parti
On 03/07/2013 09:02:27 AM, htbegin wrote:
Hi, Scott
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Scott Wood
wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 08:56:56 AM, htbegin wrote:
>> > BTW, are you actually using WITH_YAFFS_OOB? I think there are
some
>> > other
>> > things wrong with it at the moment, as mentioned here:
Hi, Scott
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> >> I just use "*length -= left_to_write - written_size" to tell the upper
>> >> level that what
>> >> had been actually happened. For the current block, "written_size" has
>> >> been written to the NAND Flash yet, so left_to_write sh
On 03/09/2013 07:06:54 PM, htbegin wrote:
Hi, Scott
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Scott Wood
wrote:
>> >> I just use "*length -= left_to_write - written_size" to tell
the upper
>> >> level that what
>> >> had been actually happened. For the current block,
"written_size" has
>> >> be
8 matches
Mail list logo