On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 09:24 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 10/09/2013 22:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> > Sure.
> >
> > Acked-by: Scott Wood
> >
> > I'm curious who's been doing these patchwork assignments and what
> > they're basing it on.
> >
>
> I think that everyone of us custodi
Hi Scott,
On 10/09/2013 22:11, Scott Wood wrote:
> Sure.
>
> Acked-by: Scott Wood
>
> I'm curious who's been doing these patchwork assignments and what
> they're basing it on.
>
I think that everyone of us custodians has write rights to assign
patches. Personally, I check the list and I assig
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 19:02 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 24/08/2013 16:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> > On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says:
> >
> > NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4),
> > 512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size:
On 24/08/2013 16:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
> On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says:
>
> NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4),
> 512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224) the ECC strength is 16.
>
> root@(none):/sys/devices/virtua
On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says:
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4),
512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224) the ECC strength is 16.
root@(none):/sys/devices/virtual/mtd/mtd0# for i in ecc_strength oobsize
subpagesize;
5 matches
Mail list logo
