On 02/26/2013 09:04:22 PM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
wrote:
No need to be quite so verbose in the comments. If someone tries
to change size to rwsize the compiler will complain about the
type mismatch.
Actually, it does give a
On 02/25/2013 11:43:48 PM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
Adjust the sizes calculated for whole partition/chip operations by
removing the size of bad blocks so we don't try to erase/read/write
past a partition/chip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 51
On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On 02/25/2013 11:43:48 PM, Harvey Chapman wrote:
Looks OK except for style issues:
Will do.
+/* We grab the nand info object here fresh because this is usually
+ * called after arg_off_size() which can change
Adjust the sizes calculated for whole partition/chip operations by
removing the size of bad blocks so we don't try to erase/read/write
past a partition/chip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 35 +++
1 file changed,
Adjust the sizes calculated for whole partition/chip operations by
removing the size of bad blocks so we don't try to erase/read/write
past a partition/chip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 51 +++
[Slightly off-topic, but I can't find the answer with google]
I changed the From: line in this patch e-mail to the address I use for this
list rather than the address I committed with. Will this affect the author line
once accepted upstream? That is, should I have left the From: address as it
On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:22 AM, Harvey Chapman hchapman-ub...@3gfp.com wrote:
[Slightly off-topic, but I can't find the answer with google]
I changed the From: line in this patch e-mail to the address I use for this
list rather than the address I committed with. Will this affect the author
From: Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com
Adjust the sizes calculated for whole partition/chip operations by
removing the size of bad blocks so we don't try to erase/read/write
past a partition/chip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 51
Adjust the sizes calculated for whole partition/chip operations by
removing the size of bad blocks so we don't try to erase/read/write
past a partition/chip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com
---
common/cmd_nand.c | 51 +++
Sorry for all of the e-mails while I fumble with git send-email.
On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:43 AM, Harvey Chapman hchap...@3gfp.com wrote:
Adjust the sizes calculated for whole partition/chip operations by
removing the size of bad blocks so we don't try to erase/read/write
past a partition/chip
10 matches
Mail list logo
