Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: remove redundant board files

2016-04-04 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 04.04.2016 um 17:36 schrieb Stephen Warren: > On 04/03/2016 09:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 03.04.2016 um 05:56 schrieb Stephen Warren: >>> Now that rpi_*defconfig and Kconfig rather than the config header file, >> >> "rpi*_defconfig"? > > Both regexes match the same set of files at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: remove redundant board files

2016-04-04 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/03/2016 09:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 03.04.2016 um 05:56 schrieb Stephen Warren: Now that rpi_*defconfig and Kconfig rather than the config header file, "rpi*_defconfig"? Both regexes match the same set of files at present, but I prefer the one I wrote, since it guarantees that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: remove redundant board files

2016-04-03 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 03.04.2016 um 05:56 schrieb Stephen Warren: > Now that rpi_*defconfig and Kconfig rather than the config header file, "rpi*_defconfig"? Also the sentence seems to be missing a verb - "Now that we use ..."? > provide the identify of the build, we don't need to separate config "identity"? >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: remove redundant board files

2016-04-03 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 09:56:10PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > Now that rpi_*defconfig and Kconfig rather than the config header file, > provide the identify of the build, we don't need to separate config > headers and board directories for each RPi variant. Set CONFIG_SYS_BOARD > and

[U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: remove redundant board files

2016-04-02 Thread Stephen Warren
Now that rpi_*defconfig and Kconfig rather than the config header file, provide the identify of the build, we don't need to separate config headers and board directories for each RPi variant. Set CONFIG_SYS_BOARD and CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME so that we can get rid of the duplication. This requires a