Hi Tom,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Tom Warren wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, jimmzhang wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:34 -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
> >> > Simon Glass's proposal to fix
Simon,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, jimmzhang wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:34 -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
>> > Simon Glass's proposal to fix this on Seaboard was NAK'd, so I
>> > removed his NS16550 references and added
Hi Tom,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:14 PM, jimmzhang wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:34 -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
> > Simon Glass's proposal to fix this on Seaboard was NAK'd, so I
> > removed his NS16550 references and added a small delay before
> > SPI/UART muxing. Tested on my Seaboard with la
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 10:34 -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
> Simon Glass's proposal to fix this on Seaboard was NAK'd, so I
> removed his NS16550 references and added a small delay before
> SPI/UART muxing. Tested on my Seaboard with large SPI reads/writes
> and saw no corruption (crc's matched) and no s
Simon Glass's proposal to fix this on Seaboard was NAK'd, so I
removed his NS16550 references and added a small delay before
SPI/UART muxing. Tested on my Seaboard with large SPI reads/writes
and saw no corruption (crc's matched) and no spurious comm chars.
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren
---
arch/arm
5 matches
Mail list logo
