On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 08:17:56 +
Ian Campbell ijc+ub...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 00:07 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Just one suggestion. It would be really nice if the Debian installer
could present itself on all the available consoles, so that the user
can use any
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 00:07 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Just one suggestion. It would be really nice if the Debian installer
could present itself on all the available consoles, so that the user
can use any of them for providing input to the installer.
There is some reason why d-i doesn't
Hi,
On 28-02-15 17:18, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 11:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
Speaking of which, if someone were to identify a suitable set of
simple-fb backports for 3.16 and they are reasonably self contained I'd
happily backport
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:18:16 +
Ian Campbell ijc+ub...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 11:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
Speaking of which, if someone were to identify a suitable set of
simple-fb backports for 3.16 and they are
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 11:49 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
Speaking of which, if someone were to identify a suitable set of
simple-fb backports for 3.16 and they are reasonably self contained I'd
happily backport them to the kenrel which is going to be in
Hi,
On 20-02-15 19:33, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:11:04 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20-02-15 11:36, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:19:51 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20-02-15 09:08, Siarhei Siamashka
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 10:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
By the right thing I mean having things just work for the end user,
whatever I'm doing having things just work is always my end goal.
This is also why I'm mostly focussing upstream, which has resulted in
Fedora 21 and the upcoming Debian
Hi,
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 10:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
By the right thing I mean having things just work for the end user,
whatever I'm doing having things just work is always my end goal.
This is also why I'm mostly focussing upstream, which has
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:49:22 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 10:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Ian, can you live with overloading the high machine-id bits to
deliberately break old kernels when not compiled with
Hi,
On 21-02-15 14:11, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:49:22 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21-02-15 11:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 10:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
Ian, can you live with overloading the high machine-id bits to
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:19:51 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20-02-15 09:08, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Store the 'compatibility revision' number in the top 4 bits of the
machine id and pass it to the kernel. The old buggy kernels will
fail to load with a very much
Hi,
On 20-02-15 09:08, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Store the 'compatibility revision' number in the top 4 bits of the
machine id and pass it to the kernel. The old buggy kernels will
fail to load with a very much googlable error message on the serial
console:
Error: unrecognized/unsupported
Store the 'compatibility revision' number in the top 4 bits of the
machine id and pass it to the kernel. The old buggy kernels will
fail to load with a very much googlable error message on the serial
console:
Error: unrecognized/unsupported machine ID (r1 = 0x100010bb)
This error message can
Hi,
On 20-02-15 11:36, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:19:51 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20-02-15 09:08, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Store the 'compatibility revision' number in the top 4 bits of the
machine id and pass it to the kernel. The old buggy
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:11:04 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20-02-15 11:36, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:19:51 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 20-02-15 09:08, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
Store the 'compatibility
15 matches
Mail list logo
