Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: udc-uclass: Fixed problem when no alias is defined in DT

Hi Vignesh, > Hi Lukasz, > > On 24/01/19 8:14 PM, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote: > > commit 801f1fa442 "dm: usb: udc: Use SEQ_ALIAS to index the USB > > gadget ports" changed the way the udevice if found. It uses the > > alias to find a udevice for a given USB port number. In the commit > > log it wa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: udc-uclass: Fixed problem when no alias is defined in DT

Hi Lukasz, On 24/01/19 8:14 PM, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote: > commit 801f1fa442 "dm: usb: udc: Use SEQ_ALIAS to index the USB gadget > ports" changed the way the udevice if found. It uses the alias to find > a udevice for a given USB port number. In the commit log it was stated > that if no alias i

[U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: udc-uclass: Fixed problem when no alias is defined in DT

commit 801f1fa442 "dm: usb: udc: Use SEQ_ALIAS to index the USB gadget ports" changed the way the udevice if found. It uses the alias to find a udevice for a given USB port number. In the commit log it was stated that if no alias is provided, the bind order will be used instead. However it doesn't