On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:37:31AM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
>
> El 01/01/2018 a las 14:41, Tom Rini escribió:
> >On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> >
> >>The only difference with the existing wait_for_bit function is the fact that
Hello Tom,
El 01/01/2018 a las 14:41, Tom Rini escribió:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
The only difference with the existing wait_for_bit function is the fact that
wait_for_bit_be expects the register size to be read.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 11:12:36AM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> The only difference with the existing wait_for_bit function is the fact that
> wait_for_bit_be expects the register size to be read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
> ---
> include/wait_bit.h | 69
> +++
The only difference with the existing wait_for_bit function is the fact that
wait_for_bit_be expects the register size to be read.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
---
include/wait_bit.h | 69 ++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --gi
4 matches
Mail list logo