Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-17 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, > > Thanks for the clarification. This confirms my initial opinion that > > NEON can be enabled in start.S on a per-board basis, as it would workin > > all situations -- This is assuming that enabling NEON would have no > > adverse effect on builds which do not use it, of course. > > I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-17 Thread Michal Simek
On 10/17/2013 10:25 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Edgar, > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:37:40 +0200, "Edgar E. Iglesias" > wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:33:28AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Albert, >>> >>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:07:40 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD >>> wrote: >>> Hi Mic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-17 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Edgar, On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 09:37:40 +0200, "Edgar E. Iglesias" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:33:28AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:07:40 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Michal, > > > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:56:20 +0200, M

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-17 Thread Edgar E. Iglesias
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:33:28AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:07:40 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:56:20 +0200, Michal Simek > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Albert, > > > > > > On 10/03/2013 10:41 AM, Albert ARIB

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-16 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack > pointer is setup after function call in _main(). > Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call > as the first function in board_init_f() which > already have co

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-16 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Albert, On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:07:40 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:56:20 +0200, Michal Simek > wrote: > > > Hi Albert, > > > > On 10/03/2013 10:41 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > > Hi Michal, > > > > > > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:58:38 +0200, Michal Simek

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-03 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:56:20 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 10/03/2013 10:41 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:58:38 +0200, Michal Simek > > wrote: > > > >> On 10/02/2013 09:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >>> Hi Michal, > >>> >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-03 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, On 10/03/2013 10:41 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:58:38 +0200, Michal Simek > wrote: > >> On 10/02/2013 09:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:38:38 +0200, Michal Simek >>> wrote: >>> Hi Albert, >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-03 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:58:38 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > On 10/02/2013 09:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:38:38 +0200, Michal Simek > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Albert, > >> > >> On 09/23/2013 04:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >>> Hi Michal, >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-03 Thread Michal Simek
On 10/02/2013 09:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:38:38 +0200, Michal Simek > wrote: > >> Hi Albert, >> >> On 09/23/2013 04:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:19:52 +0200, Michal Simek >>> wrote: >>> On 09/23/2013

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-10-02 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:38:38 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 09/23/2013 04:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:19:52 +0200, Michal Simek > > wrote: > > > >> On 09/23/2013 02:31 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >>> Hi Michal, > >>> >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-09-24 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Albert, On 09/23/2013 04:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:19:52 +0200, Michal Simek > wrote: > >> On 09/23/2013 02:31 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200, Michal Simek >>> wrote: >>> Zynq lowlevel_init(

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-09-23 Thread Michal Simek
On 09/23/2013 04:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:19:52 +0200, Michal Simek > wrote: > >> On 09/23/2013 02:31 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200, Michal Simek >>> wrote: >>> Zynq lowlevel_init() was implem

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-09-23 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:19:52 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > On 09/23/2013 02:31 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200, Michal Simek > > wrote: > > > >> Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack > >> pointer is setup after functi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-09-23 Thread Michal Simek
On 09/23/2013 02:31 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200, Michal Simek > wrote: > >> Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack >> pointer is setup after function call in _main(). >> Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call >> as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-09-23 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Michal, On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:52:02 +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack > pointer is setup after function call in _main(). > Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call > as the first function in board_init_f() which > already have co

[U-Boot] [PATCH] zynq: Use arch_cpu_init() instead of lowlevel_init()

2013-08-22 Thread Michal Simek
Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack pointer is setup after function call in _main(). Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call as the first function in board_init_f() which already have correct stack pointer. Reported-by: Sven Schwermer Signed-off-by: Michal Simek