On 1/10/20 1:38 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Looks like -next wasn't used for this, ping on getting this into master now?
>
Looks like a minor merge conflict now in master for this, I'll post a v2
to help with that.
Andrew
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> On 12/16/19 3:50 PM, Andrew F. Da
Hi Tom,
Looks like -next wasn't used for this, ping on getting this into master now?
Thanks,
Andrew
On 12/16/19 3:50 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I see you have a -next again, if you don't want to take this for the
> v2020.01 perhaps this could be a good candidate for the next?
>
>
Hi Tom,
I see you have a -next again, if you don't want to take this for the
v2020.01 perhaps this could be a good candidate for the next?
Andrew
On 11/20/19 10:59 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
>
> On 20/11/19 11:10 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> This series brings up High-Security
On 20/11/19 11:10 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This series brings up High-Security (HS) device support on the J721e
> platform. Support for this K3 HS device is much like the existing
> AM65x HS and this series leverages much of that support.
>
> There are also a couple tangentia
Hello all,
This series brings up High-Security (HS) device support on the J721e
platform. Support for this K3 HS device is much like the existing
AM65x HS and this series leverages much of that support.
There are also a couple tangentially related fixups that I noticed while
adding this support a
5 matches
Mail list logo