Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Fix incorrect usage of the (FIT) DT node unit address

2017-12-12 Thread Andre Przywara
Hi, On 12/12/17 04:50, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > 2017-12-12 13:38 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : >> Hi Andre, >> >> On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> The DT spec[1] demands a unit-address in a node name (name@address) to >>> match the "reg" property inside that node

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Fix incorrect usage of the (FIT) DT node unit address

2017-12-11 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Simon, 2017-12-12 13:38 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : > Hi Andre, > > On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: >> The DT spec[1] demands a unit-address in a node name (name@address) to >> match the "reg" property inside that node: >> uart0: serial@1c28000 { >> reg

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Fix incorrect usage of the (FIT) DT node unit address

2017-12-11 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Andre, On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: > The DT spec[1] demands a unit-address in a node name (name@address) to > match the "reg" property inside that node: > uart0: serial@1c28000 { > reg = <0x01c28000 0x400>; > > If there is no

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Fix incorrect usage of the (FIT) DT node unit address

2017-12-03 Thread Andre Przywara
The DT spec[1] demands a unit-address in a node name (name@address) to match the "reg" property inside that node: uart0: serial@1c28000 { reg = <0x01c28000 0x400>; If there is no reg property in a node, there must not be a unit address in the node name a