I posted v2 for this series.
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 09:35 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> > [ Makefiles rearranged, how to verify the change? ]
>
> But your suggestion sounds interesting.
> If we could programmatically compare the generated executables
> in an easy way, that would be worth checking.
>
> So I gave it a tr
Hello Gerhard.
> This test only proves that the code compiles, nothing else. Even
> for a single board you may not run-test all features, given the
> many functions and high interactivity and options that U-Boot
> provides. This becomes worse when your change affects several
> more boards or ev
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 10:42 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
> First of all, this series convert makefiles in sub directories
> to Kbuild style.
>
> What this series do is quite simple:
> - Moving common lines in sub makefiles to a new file 'scripts/Makefile.build'
> - Renaming COBJS-y and SOB
> 0002-0019 change sub makefiles into a Kbuild suitable form using obj-y.
> In order to avoid creating a big patch file, they are divided
> by CPU architectures and categories.
>
> 0002-0007: refactor under arch/arm/
> 0008-0016: refactor libraries which are common for all architectures
> 0
Kbuild in U-Boot has been talked for a while
and RFC patches were posted by Simon Glass.
(Refer to "RFC: Add Kbuild system to U-Boot"
posted by Simon, May 12, 2013)
Simon's effort is a good start point but
varous critical features were missing from his patch series.
I have also been eager to int
6 matches
Mail list logo