Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/27] Provide a generic io.h & address mapping functions

2016-11-19 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Paul, On 17 November 2016 at 08:32, Paul Burton wrote: > On Monday, 3 October 2016 15:49:33 GMT Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> On 1 October 2016 at 08:19, Paul Burton wrote: >> > Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial >> > implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/27] Provide a generic io.h & address mapping functions

2016-11-17 Thread Paul Burton
On Monday, 3 October 2016 15:49:33 GMT Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 1 October 2016 at 08:19, Paul Burton wrote: > > Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial > > implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a > > physical address to a pointer for u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/27] Provide a generic io.h & address mapping functions

2016-10-03 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Paul, On 1 October 2016 at 08:19, Paul Burton wrote: > Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial > implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a > physical address to a pointer for use a virtual address & vice-versa. > This results in a lot of duplicat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/27] Provide a generic io.h & address mapping functions

2016-10-01 Thread Angelo Dureghello
Hi Paul, On 01/10/2016 16:19, Paul Burton wrote: Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a physical address to a pointer for use a virtual address & vice-versa. This results in a lot of duplicate implementati

[U-Boot] [PATCH 01/27] Provide a generic io.h & address mapping functions

2016-10-01 Thread Paul Burton
Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a physical address to a pointer for use a virtual address & vice-versa. This results in a lot of duplicate implementations of these mapping functions. The functions provi