Hi Paul,
On 17 November 2016 at 08:32, Paul Burton wrote:
> On Monday, 3 October 2016 15:49:33 GMT Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On 1 October 2016 at 08:19, Paul Burton wrote:
>> > Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial
>> > implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_t
On Monday, 3 October 2016 15:49:33 GMT Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 1 October 2016 at 08:19, Paul Burton wrote:
> > Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial
> > implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a
> > physical address to a pointer for u
Hi Paul,
On 1 October 2016 at 08:19, Paul Burton wrote:
> Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial
> implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a
> physical address to a pointer for use a virtual address & vice-versa.
> This results in a lot of duplicat
Hi Paul,
On 01/10/2016 16:19, Paul Burton wrote:
Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial
implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a
physical address to a pointer for use a virtual address & vice-versa.
This results in a lot of duplicate implementati
Most architectures currently supported by U-Boot use trivial
implementations of map_to_physmem & virt_to_phys which simply cast a
physical address to a pointer for use a virtual address & vice-versa.
This results in a lot of duplicate implementations of these mapping
functions.
The functions provi
5 matches
Mail list logo