Some calls to flash_protect() do not check that info is not
NULL. This change prevents this from causing random memory to
be stomped on.
---
common/flash.c | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/flash.c b/common/flash.c
index eb4b2f5..dc376ee 10064
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 01:26:35 Mark Tomlinson wrote:
> Some calls to flash_protect() do not check that info is not
> NULL. This change prevents this from causing random memory to
> be stomped on.
> ---
any patches need a s-o-b tag before they'll be accepted
> NOTICE: This message contains privil
Dear Mark Tomlinson,
In message
<1274160395-9308-2-git-send-email-mark.tomlin...@alliedtelesis.co.nz> you wrote:
> Some calls to flash_protect() do not check that info is not
> NULL. This change prevents this from causing random memory to
> be stomped on.
When exactly would that be the case?
>
3 matches
Mail list logo