Hi Stephen,
Looks good to me then. I wasn't sure how U-Boot was typically used on the
RPi.
Regards,
Jonathan
On Sunday, 7 February 2016, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 02/06/2016 12:30 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > I actually read the DT loaded by RPi's
On 02/06/2016 12:30 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I actually read the DT loaded by RPi's binary firmware on an RPi 2 in a
> U-Boot script:
> fdt addr ${fdt_addr_r} && fdt get value bootargs /chosen bootargs
> fatload mmc 0:1 ${kernel_addr_r} uImage
> bootm ${kernel_addr_r} -
Hi Stephen,
I actually read the DT loaded by RPi's binary firmware on an RPi 2 in a
U-Boot script:
fdt addr ${fdt_addr_r} && fdt get value bootargs /chosen bootargs
fatload mmc 0:1 ${kernel_addr_r} uImage
bootm ${kernel_addr_r} - ${fdt_addr_r}
Essentially this loads the kernel with the same
Update rpi-common.h's documentation that describes the rationale for
choosing various addresses for standardized variables used by boot
scripts. This comment was correct when written, but not updated when some
of the values were changed.
Fixes: 14006a567105 ("rpi: set fdt_addr_r to 0x0100 to
4 matches
Mail list logo