Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm/km: speed up i2c access for keymile boards

2012-02-08 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] > Sent: 08 February 2012 14:20 > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp; Heiko Schocher > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/km: speed up i2c access for keymile > boards > > Hi Prafulla,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm/km: speed up i2c access for keymile boards

2012-02-08 Thread Holger Brunck
Hi Prafulla, On 12/14/2011 04:31 PM, Holger Brunck wrote: > We don't need 3us delay for our i2c bus. Decrease it to 1us. > It would also be possible to use 100ns in the future, but > currently kirkwood has no ndelay implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck > Cc: Valentin Longchamp > Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm/km: speed up i2c access for keymile boards

2011-12-14 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Holger, Holger Brunck wrote: > We don't need 3us delay for our i2c bus. Decrease it to 1us. > It would also be possible to use 100ns in the future, but > currently kirkwood has no ndelay implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck > Cc: Valentin Longchamp > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar > C

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm/km: speed up i2c access for keymile boards

2011-12-14 Thread Holger Brunck
We don't need 3us delay for our i2c bus. Decrease it to 1us. It would also be possible to use 100ns in the future, but currently kirkwood has no ndelay implementation. Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck Cc: Valentin Longchamp Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: Heiko Schocher --- include/configs/km/km_arm.h