On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:04 PM Simon Goldschmidt
wrote:
>
>
>
> Stefan Roese schrieb am Fr., 16. Aug. 2019, 14:45:
>>
>> This patch removes the x86 architecture specific GD flags
>> (GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT & GD_FLG_WARM_BOOT), as they are not used. Only
>> GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT is referenced in coreboot.c
Stefan Roese schrieb am Fr., 16. Aug. 2019, 14:45:
> This patch removes the x86 architecture specific GD flags
> (GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT & GD_FLG_WARM_BOOT), as they are not used. Only
> GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT is referenced in coreboot.c but assigned in start16.S.
> But the coreboot target does not use start
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 8:45 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> This patch removes the x86 architecture specific GD flags
> (GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT & GD_FLG_WARM_BOOT), as they are not used. Only
> GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT is referenced in coreboot.c but assigned in start16.S.
> But the coreboot target does not use sta
This patch removes the x86 architecture specific GD flags
(GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT & GD_FLG_WARM_BOOT), as they are not used. Only
GD_FLG_COLD_BOOT is referenced in coreboot.c but assigned in start16.S.
But the coreboot target does not use start16.S at all and boots directly
from the 32-bit start code.
S
4 matches
Mail list logo