CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
---
README | 12
arch/arm/lib/board.c |5 +
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:00:19PM +0300, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
> ---
> README | 12
> arch/arm/lib/board.c
Hi Harvey,
Le 04/07/2011 23:06, Christopher Harvey a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:00:19PM +0300, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
>> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
>> ---
Le 05/07/2011 00:03, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> Hi Harvey,
Sorry Christopher, I mixed up.
> Le 04/07/2011 23:06, Christopher Harvey a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:00:19PM +0300, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
>>> common arm cod
Dear Christopher Harvey,
In message <20110704210619.ga3...@harvey-pc.matrox.com> you wrote:
>
> I'm curious, is it a feature that bd->bi_arch_number can be set at
> runtime? Do any boards actually make a decision about what value to
Yes, this is a feature. It comes in handy in a number of cases.
On 07/05/11 00:06, Christopher Harvey wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 12:00:19PM +0300, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
>> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
>> ---
>> README
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:16:12AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Christopher Harvey,
>
> In message <20110704210619.ga3...@harvey-pc.matrox.com> you wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious, is it a feature that bd->bi_arch_number can be set at
> > runtime? Do any boards actually make a decision about what
On 07/05/11 17:08, char...@matrox.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 12:16:12AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Christopher Harvey,
>>
>> In message <20110704210619.ga3...@harvey-pc.matrox.com> you wrote:
>>> I'm curious, is it a feature that bd->bi_arch_number can be set at
>>> runtime? Do
Hi Igor,
Le 04/07/2011 11:00, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
> ---
> README | 12
> arch/arm/lib/board.c |5
On 07/06/11 21:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> Le 04/07/2011 11:00, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
>> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg
>> ---
>> README
Hi Igor,
Le 06/07/2011 22:05, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
> On 07/06/11 21:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>
>> Hi Igor,
>>
>> Le 04/07/2011 11:00, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
>>> common arm code instead of setting it in the board code.
>>>
On 07/07/11 19:07, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> Le 06/07/2011 22:05, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>> On 07/06/11 21:53, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Igor,
>>>
>>> Le 04/07/2011 11:00, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
CONFIG_MACH_TYPE can be used to set the machine type number in the
common
Le 07/07/2011 18:51, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>>> If we have this option and it is documented, then any new board can use it
>>> instead of thinking (although it is simple) where and how to dereference
>>> the bi_arch_number.
>>
>> Not sure I get you there. Can you elaborate on a more precise examp
On 07/07/11 20:46, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 07/07/2011 18:51, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>
If we have this option and it is documented, then any new board can use it
instead of thinking (although it is simple) where and how to dereference
the bi_arch_number.
>>>
>>> Not sure I get you
Hi Albert,
On 07/08/11 00:06, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 07/07/11 20:46, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Le 07/07/2011 18:51, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>>
> If we have this option and it is documented, then any new board can use it
> instead of thinking (although it is simple) where and how to deref
Hi Igor,
Le 13/07/2011 07:52, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
> Hi Albert,
>
> On 07/08/11 00:06, Igor Grinberg wrote:
>> On 07/07/11 20:46, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Le 07/07/2011 18:51, Igor Grinberg a écrit :
>>>
>> If we have this option and it is documented, then any new board can use
>> it
Hi again Igor,
Le 14/07/2011 16:10, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> Pragmatism against perfection: let's go for 2, then. Change the boards
> you intended to change, and from now on reviewers for any change to a
> board should point out the move to CONFIG_MACH_TYPE as mandatory.
Forgot to mention:
Th
On 07/14/11 17:20, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi again Igor,
>
> Le 14/07/2011 16:10, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>
>> Pragmatism against perfection: let's go for 2, then. Change the boards
>> you intended to change, and from now on reviewers for any change to a
>> board should point out the move to CON
18 matches
Mail list logo
