On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:44 PM,
wrote:
> From: Haiying Wang
>
> CONFIG_ENV_SIZE of MPC8569MDS was wrongly set to CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE which
> is 128KB, so it took longer time to do crc32 calculation for ENV than it
> should
> do. It causes the bootup for MPC8569MDS significantly slow. This pa
Dear Haiying Wang,
In message <1285786279.2939.29.ca...@r54964-12.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-29-09 at 20:25 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > You submitted the same patch series twice, without any version ID in
> > the subject, and without any other indication about possible changes
On Wed, 2010-29-09 at 20:25 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> You submitted the same patch series twice, without any version ID in
> the subject, and without any other indication about possible changes.
I am so sorry for sending the patchset twice. I did not add
"smtp-server" at the first time, then I
Dear haiying.w...@freescale.com,
In message <1285782256-21992-1-git-send-email-haiying.w...@freescale.com> you
wrote:
> From: Haiying Wang
>
> CONFIG_ENV_SIZE of MPC8569MDS was wrongly set to CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE which
> is 128KB, so it took longer time to do crc32 calculation for ENV than it
From: Haiying Wang
CONFIG_ENV_SIZE of MPC8569MDS was wrongly set to CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE which
is 128KB, so it took longer time to do crc32 calculation for ENV than it should
do. It causes the bootup for MPC8569MDS significantly slow. This patch fixs it
to 0x2000(8KB), also fix the comment for CO
From: Haiying Wang
CONFIG_ENV_SIZE of MPC8569MDS was wrongly set to CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE which
is 128KB, so it took longer time to do crc32 calculation for ENV than it should
do. It causes the bootup for MPC8569MDS significantly slow. This patch fixs it
to 0x2000(8KB), also fix the comment for CO
6 matches
Mail list logo
