On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:21 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 14, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/14/2012 04:31 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> These are not supported as indi
On 08/15/2012 09:21 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 08/14/2012 04:31 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>
These are not supported as individual build targets, but instead
are supported by anothe
On Aug 14, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 04:31 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> These are not supported as individual build targets, but instead
>>> are supported by another target.
>>>
>>> The dead p4040 defines in particu
On 08/14/2012 04:31 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> These are not supported as individual build targets, but instead
>> are supported by another target.
>>
>> The dead p4040 defines in particular had bitrotted significantly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Scott
On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> These are not supported as individual build targets, but instead
> are supported by another target.
>
> The dead p4040 defines in particular had bitrotted significantly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
> ---
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile
These are not supported as individual build targets, but instead
are supported by another target.
The dead p4040 defines in particular had bitrotted significantly.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile |3 --
arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h | 68
6 matches
Mail list logo