On 5/28/19 1:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:24:34AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/28/19 5:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:44:52AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/28/19 4:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek V
On 5/28/2019 4:19 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:24:34AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/28/19 5:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:44:52AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/28/19 4:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:24:34AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/28/19 5:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:44:52AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 5/28/19 4:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/28/19 4:06 AM,
On 5/28/19 5:04 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:44:52AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/28/19 4:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 5/28/19 4:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:49:13AM +0200, Marek V
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:44:52AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/28/19 4:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 5/28/19 4:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:49:13AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>
> If the source
On 5/28/19 4:42 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/28/19 4:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:49:13AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>
If the source and destination buffer address is identical, there is
no need to mem
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 04:07:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/28/19 4:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:49:13AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
> >> If the source and destination buffer address is identical, there is
> >> no need to memcpy() the content. Skip the memcpy() i
On 5/28/19 4:06 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:49:13AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>> If the source and destination buffer address is identical, there is
>> no need to memcpy() the content. Skip the memcpy() in such a case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
>> Cc: Michal Simek
>
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:49:13AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> If the source and destination buffer address is identical, there is
> no need to memcpy() the content. Skip the memcpy() in such a case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
> Cc: Michal Simek
> Cc: Tom Rini
Shouldn't memcpy catch that
If the source and destination buffer address is identical, there is
no need to memcpy() the content. Skip the memcpy() in such a case.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut
Cc: Michal Simek
Cc: Tom Rini
---
common/spl/spl_ram.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/
10 matches
Mail list logo