Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] MX51: iomux: Added support for mxc_iomux_set_input()

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: > Hi Stefano, > Hi David, > Hmmm. I thought it was a trivial and obviously missing function to make > iomux.c complete. > Someone just needed to write it. I didn't think it needed > any more explaining than that, but I'll do it in the next version of the > patch > set (wi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] MX51: iomux: Added support for mxc_iomux_set_input()

2010-08-20 Thread Stefano Babic
David Jander wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Jander > --- Hi Dave, > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c |8 +++- > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > Probably iut is better you set a more useful comment in your commit. Instead of "Added support for mxc_iomux_set_input()",

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] MX51: iomux: Added support for mxc_iomux_set_input()

2010-08-19 Thread David Jander
Signed-off-by: David Jander --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c |8 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c index 62b2954..fb48f1c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx51/iomux.c +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/