From: Jiandong Zheng
Add support for the iproc NAND, and enable on Cygnus and NSP boards.
Signed-off-by: Jiandong Zheng
Signed-off-by: Steve Rae
---
There was a previous attempt to implement this "iproc NAND"
(see: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/505399), however, due to the
amount of change
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:26:27PM -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
> From: Jiandong Zheng
>
> Add support for the iproc NAND, and enable on Cygnus and NSP boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiandong Zheng
> Signed-off-by: Steve Rae
> ---
> There was a previous attempt to implement this "iproc NAND"
> (see: h
Is it expected the _every_ CONFIG_* and CONFIG_SYS_* will be moved to Kconfig?
What about #defines that will absolutely never used by anyone else?
for example, I (may) have a code fragment that distinguishes between
"CONFIG_CYGNUS" and "CONFIG_NSPLUS"...
Would these need to be Kconfig? or would tha
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:07:46AM -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
> Is it expected the _every_ CONFIG_* and CONFIG_SYS_* will be moved to Kconfig?
> What about #defines that will absolutely never used by anyone else?
> for example, I (may) have a code fragment that distinguishes between
> "CONFIG_CYGNUS"
Thanks for this clarification...
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:07:46AM -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>
>> Is it expected the _every_ CONFIG_* and CONFIG_SYS_* will be moved to
>> Kconfig?
>> What about #defines that will absolutely never used by anyone
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 14:26 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
> From: Jiandong Zheng
>
> Add support for the iproc NAND, and enable on Cygnus and NSP boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiandong Zheng
> Signed-off-by: Steve Rae
> ---
> There was a previous attempt to implement this "iproc NAND"
> (see: http://pa
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:47 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 14:26 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>> > > From: Jiandong Zheng
>> > >
>> > > Add support for the iproc NAND, and
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 12:13 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:47 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 14:26 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
> > > > > From: J
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 12:13 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:47 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, 20
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 12:13 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:47 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, 201
(trying newer address for Steve, sorry for the spam)
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 12:13 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:47 -0800, Steve Rae wrote:
>>> > > On Fri, Mar 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
