Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/37] i2c: add support for offset overflow in to address

Hi Robert, On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 08:35, Robert Beckett wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 21:40 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 09:55, Robert Beckett < > > bob.beck...@collabora.com> wrote: > > > Some devices (2 wire eeproms for example) use some bits from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/37] i2c: add support for offset overflow in to address

On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 21:40 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 09:55, Robert Beckett < > bob.beck...@collabora.com> wrote: > > Some devices (2 wire eeproms for example) use some bits from the > > chip > > address to represent the high bits of the offset instead of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/37] i2c: add support for offset overflow in to address

Hi Robert, On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 09:55, Robert Beckett wrote: > > Some devices (2 wire eeproms for example) use some bits from the chip > address to represent the high bits of the offset instead of or as well > as using multiple bytes for the offset, effectively stealing chip > addresses on the

[U-Boot] [PATCH 16/37] i2c: add support for offset overflow in to address

Some devices (2 wire eeproms for example) use some bits from the chip address to represent the high bits of the offset instead of or as well as using multiple bytes for the offset, effectively stealing chip addresses on the bus. Add a chip offset mask that can be set for any i2c chip which gets