On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 12:04 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Holger,
>
> In message <52d64089.6070...@keymile.com> you wrote:
> >
> > > This commit removes support for the Freescale MPC82xx Power
> > > Architecture processors, i. e. MPC8240, MPC8245, MPC8247, MPC8248,
> > > MPC8250, MPC8255, MP
On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> ….. so we will keep it all,
> and just throw out the offending boards.
Cool! :) I'll have to dig out some old boards and see if they still work.
Thanks.
-- Dan
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-
Dear Holger,
In message <52d6beb7.5010...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>
> > Do you agree with "keeping 824x" support only?
>
> is this question adressed to myside or to Tom? From myside it's absolutely ok
> to
> keep 824x only.
It was directed at you. But in the meantime I've also been told that
Hi Wolfgang,
On 01/15/2014 01:45 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> So if keeping 82xx support would't generate to much overload for u-boot I
>> would
>> > appreciate to keep it. But if it interferes with future u-boot development
>> > we
>> > could also move it to a keymile specific branch.
> Do you a
/me sniffs
High five...
On Jan 15, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>
>> You are asking a heretical question! ;-)
>>
>> 8xx is where it all started - U-Boot was anteceded by the PPCBoot
>> project, which started as 8xxrom - some 15 years ago... Ripping this
>> out of U-Boot would ju
>
> You are asking a heretical question! ;-)
>
> 8xx is where it all started - U-Boot was anteceded by the PPCBoot
> project, which started as 8xxrom - some 15 years ago... Ripping this
> out of U-Boot would just break my heart...
hear,hear :) We started 14 years ago with 8xx and PPCBoot.
8xx h
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:04:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Holger,
>
> In message <52d64089.6070...@keymile.com> you wrote:
> >
> > > This commit removes support for the Freescale MPC82xx Power
> > > Architecture processors, i. e. MPC8240, MPC8245, MPC8247, MPC8248,
> > > MPC8250, MPC8
Dear Holger,
In message <52d67c60.2040...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>
> > 1) We apply the patch as is, and if you really have to modify your
> >code you would do this out-of-tree based on the last frozen
> >version.
> >
>
> yes we could do that and keep a seperate branch for this board, b
Hello Wolfgang,
On 01/15/2014 12:04 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Holger,
>
> In message <52d64089.6070...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>>
>>> This commit removes support for the Freescale MPC82xx Power
>>> Architecture processors, i. e. MPC8240, MPC8245, MPC8247, MPC8248,
>>> MPC8250, MPC8255, MPC8
Dear Holger,
In message <52d64089.6070...@keymile.com> you wrote:
>
> > This commit removes support for the Freescale MPC82xx Power
> > Architecture processors, i. e. MPC8240, MPC8245, MPC8247, MPC8248,
> > MPC8250, MPC8255, MPC8260, MPC8265, MPC8266, MPC8272, MPC8280, ...
> >
> > They have been
Hi Wolfgang,
On 01/15/2014 08:48 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> This commit removes support for the Freescale MPC82xx Power
> Architecture processors, i. e. MPC8240, MPC8245, MPC8247, MPC8248,
> MPC8250, MPC8255, MPC8260, MPC8265, MPC8266, MPC8272, MPC8280, ...
>
> They have been out of production fo
This commit removes support for the Freescale MPC82xx Power
Architecture processors, i. e. MPC8240, MPC8245, MPC8247, MPC8248,
MPC8250, MPC8255, MPC8260, MPC8265, MPC8266, MPC8272, MPC8280, ...
They have been out of production for years, and no active users left
here. As some boards start causing
12 matches
Mail list logo
