On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 08:22:45AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:36:11PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > Am 10.01.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > > >On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Simon
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:11:38PM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
>
>
> On 10.01.19 16:06, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:03:27PM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10.01.19 03:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:28:23AM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
> On
On 10.01.19 16:53, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tom, Soeren,
>>
>> On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Why default? Well, "everyone"
>>> agrees that defaulting to EFI application support means the widest
>>> choice of out of
On 10.01.19 16:06, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:03:27PM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>
>> On 10.01.19 03:30, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:28:23AM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
On 09.01.19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:36:11PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > Am 10.01.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > >On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > >>On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:36:11PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > Am 10.01.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > >On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > >>On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:47 PM Stefano Babic wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 10/01/19 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:51:51PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On 10/01/19 15:44, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic
Hi Tom,
On 10/01/19 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:51:51PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 10/01/19 15:44, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Tom, Soeren,
On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:36:11PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Am 10.01.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Tom Rini:
> >On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Hi Tom, Soeren,
> >>>
> >>>On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom
Am 10.01.2019 um 16:56 schrieb Tom Rini:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Tom, Soeren,
On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Soeren,
On
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:11:53AM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tom, Soeren,
> >
> > On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > >> Hi Soeren,
> > >>
> > >> On
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom, Soeren,
>
> On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
[snip]
> > Why default? Well, "everyone"
> > agrees that defaulting to EFI application support means the widest
> > choice of out of the box software support.
>
> I am unsure
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:51:51PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 10/01/19 15:44, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> Hi Tom, Soeren,
> >>
> >> On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:03:27PM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
>
>
> On 10.01.19 03:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:28:23AM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
> >>
> >> On 09.01.19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi
Hi Tom,
On 10/01/19 15:44, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Tom, Soeren,
>>
>> On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Soeren,
On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:00:13AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Tom, Soeren,
>
> On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> Hi Soeren,
> >>
> >> On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
> >>> Hi Stefano,
> >>>
> >>> On 08.01.19
On 10.01.19 03:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:28:23AM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>
>> On 09.01.19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Soeren,
On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 17:39 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 9:00 AM Stefano Babic wrote:
>
> Hi Tom, Soeren,
>
> On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> Hi Soeren,
> >>
> >> On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
> >>> Hi Stefano,
> >>>
> >>> On 08.01.19 11:24,
Hi Tom, Soeren,
On 09/01/19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Soeren,
>>
>> On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>> Hi Stefano,
>>>
>>> On 08.01.19 11:24, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Soeren,
On 08/01/19 11:14, Soeren Moch
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:28:23AM +0100, Soeren Moch wrote:
>
>
> On 09.01.19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> Hi Soeren,
> >>
> >> On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
> >>> Hi Stefano,
> >>>
> >>> On 08.01.19 11:24, Stefano Babic
On 09.01.19 23:39, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Soeren,
>>
>> On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>> Hi Stefano,
>>>
>>> On 08.01.19 11:24, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Soeren,
On 08/01/19 11:14, Soeren Moch wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:01:37PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Soeren,
>
> On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > On 08.01.19 11:24, Stefano Babic wrote:
> >> Hi Soeren,
> >>
> >> On 08/01/19 11:14, Soeren Moch wrote:
> >>> Stefano,
> >>>
> >>> can you apply this for
Hi Soeren,
On 08/01/19 12:03, Soeren Moch wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 08.01.19 11:24, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Soeren,
>>
>> On 08/01/19 11:14, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>> Stefano,
>>>
>>> can you apply this for v2019.01? This is really a important fix to avoid
>>> environment and u-boot binary
Hi Stefano,
On 08.01.19 11:24, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Soeren,
>
> On 08/01/19 11:14, Soeren Moch wrote:
>> Stefano,
>>
>> can you apply this for v2019.01? This is really a important fix to avoid
>> environment and u-boot binary overwriting each other.
>> It is also a small local fix which
Hi Soeren,
On 08/01/19 11:14, Soeren Moch wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> can you apply this for v2019.01? This is really a important fix to avoid
> environment and u-boot binary overwriting each other.
> It is also a small local fix which cannot hurt anybody else.
I will apply and I send a new PR. This
Stefano,
can you apply this for v2019.01? This is really a important fix to avoid
environment and u-boot binary overwriting each other.
It is also a small local fix which cannot hurt anybody else.
Thanks,
Soeren
On 05.01.19 09:31, Soeren Moch wrote:
> The current defconfig build generates a
The current defconfig build generates a u-boot.imx file that is too large
for the available space on a eMMC/SD card. Installing this file overwrites
the u-boot environment. So disable the unused FIT support to reduce the
size of the u-boot binary.
Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch
---
Cc: Stefano Babic
28 matches
Mail list logo