On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:59 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 10:05, Simon Goldschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Stefan Roese schrieb am Fr., 16. Aug. 2019, 14:45:
> >>
> >> With the removal of the x86 specific GD flags, there are no arch-
> >> specific GD flags any more. Let's r
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 10:05, Simon Goldschmidt
wrote:
>
>
>
> Stefan Roese schrieb am Fr., 16. Aug. 2019, 14:45:
>>
>> With the removal of the x86 specific GD flags, there are no arch-
>> specific GD flags any more. Let's remove the comment about reserving the
>> upper 16 bits for arch-specific
Stefan Roese schrieb am Fr., 16. Aug. 2019, 14:45:
> With the removal of the x86 specific GD flags, there are no arch-
> specific GD flags any more. Let's remove the comment about reserving the
> upper 16 bits for arch-specific flags in the common header. This gives
> us more flexibility with the
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 8:45 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> With the removal of the x86 specific GD flags, there are no arch-
> specific GD flags any more. Let's remove the comment about reserving the
> upper 16 bits for arch-specific flags in the common header. This gives
> us more flexibility with t
With the removal of the x86 specific GD flags, there are no arch-
specific GD flags any more. Let's remove the comment about reserving the
upper 16 bits for arch-specific flags in the common header. This gives
us more flexibility with the usage of the GD flags.
As a matter of fact, we are already
5 matches
Mail list logo