On 26/01/2016 15:01, Ye Li wrote:
> The checking with max frequency supported is not correct, because the temp
> is calculated by max pre and post dividers. We can decrease any divider to
> meet the max frequency limitation. Actually, the calculation below the codes
> is doing this way to find be
On 26/01/2016 15:01, Ye Li wrote:
> The checking with max frequency supported is not correct, because the temp
> is calculated by max pre and post dividers. We can decrease any divider to
> meet the max frequency limitation. Actually, the calculation below the codes
> is doing this way to find best
The checking with max frequency supported is not correct, because the temp
is calculated by max pre and post dividers. We can decrease any divider to
meet the max frequency limitation. Actually, the calculation below the codes
is doing this way to find best pre and post dividers.
Signed-off-by: Ye
3 matches
Mail list logo
