On Dienstag, 13. September 2016 12:33:15 CEST Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/12/2016 03:48 PM, Stefan Bruens wrote:
> > On Montag, 12. September 2016 12:39:35 CEST you wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2016 02:46 PM, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> >>> This is a regression test for a crash happening if the first dirent
>
On 09/12/2016 03:48 PM, Stefan Bruens wrote:
On Montag, 12. September 2016 12:39:35 CEST you wrote:
On 09/11/2016 02:46 PM, Stefan Brüns wrote:
This is a regression test for a crash happening if the first dirent
in the block matches. Code tried to access a predecessor entry which
does not exist
On Montag, 12. September 2016 12:39:35 CEST you wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 02:46 PM, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> > This is a regression test for a crash happening if the first dirent
> > in the block matches. Code tried to access a predecessor entry which
> > does not exist.
> > The crash happened for any bl
On 09/11/2016 02:46 PM, Stefan Brüns wrote:
This is a regression test for a crash happening if the first dirent
in the block matches. Code tried to access a predecessor entry which
does not exist.
The crash happened for any block, but "." is always the first entry in
the first directory block and
This is a regression test for a crash happening if the first dirent
in the block matches. Code tried to access a predecessor entry which
does not exist.
The crash happened for any block, but "." is always the first entry in
the first directory block and thus easy to check for.
Signed-off-by: Stefa
5 matches
Mail list logo