On Monday 20 February 2012 09:38 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 10:18 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
[...]
I will get back with more details on the Linaro GCC 2012.01 later.
I meant the Linaro GCC 2012.01 tool-chain problem
This is a different problem. Some of
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:19:14PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2012 16:53:40 Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59 Simon Glass wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 09:33:31 Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:19:14PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2012 16:53:40 Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 09:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 09:33:31 Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:19:14PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2012 16:53:40 Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:03:55 Aneesh V wrote:
I was planning to do that in the next revision of this series. BTW, I
guess the following in the arm linkage.h of kernel is useful too. Any
thoughts?
#define __ALIGN .align 0
#define __ALIGN_STR .align 0
arm allows unaligned instruction
On Wednesday 22 February 2012 12:58 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:03:55 Aneesh V wrote:
I was planning to do that in the next revision of this series. BTW, I
guess the following in the arm linkage.h of kernel is useful too. Any
thoughts?
#define __ALIGN .align 0
On Saturday 18 February 2012 10:18 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
[...]
I will get back with more details on the Linaro GCC 2012.01 later.
I meant the Linaro GCC 2012.01 tool-chain problem
This is a different problem. Some of the .rodata symbols are given an
odd address although
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59 Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
-.globl reset_cpu
+.type reset_cpu, %function
+.globalreset_cpu
Should we introduce a macro to deal
Hi Tom, Aneesh,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59 Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
-.globl reset_cpu
+.type reset_cpu,
On Monday 20 February 2012 15:07:46 Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59 Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
-.globl reset_cpu
+.type reset_cpu, %function
+.global
On Monday 20 February 2012 16:53:40 Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59 Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
-.globl
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday 20 February 2012 16:53:40 Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 02:15:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59
Hi Aneesh,
Le 17/02/2012 12:09, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:27 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.typefunc-name, %function
This marks the symbol as a function in the object
header which in
On Friday 17 February 2012 10:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 08:57:31 Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.typefunc-name, %function
This marks the symbol as a function in the object
header which in turn
Hi Aneesh,
Le 18/02/2012 12:12, Aneesh V a écrit :
On Friday 17 February 2012 10:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 08:57:31 Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.typefunc-name, %function
This marks the symbol
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 03:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 17/02/2012 12:09, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:27 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.typefunc-name,
Hi Aneesh,
Le 18/02/2012 14:24, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 03:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 17/02/2012 12:09, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:27 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive
On Saturday 18 February 2012 06:54 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 03:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 17/02/2012 12:09, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:27 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive
Hi Aneesh,
Le 18/02/2012 17:34, Aneesh V a écrit :
On Saturday 18 February 2012 06:54 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 03:43 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
Le 17/02/2012 12:09, Aneesh V a écrit :
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:27 PM, Aneesh V
Hi Anesh,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.type func-name, %function
This marks the symbol as a function in the object
header which in turn helps the linker in some cases.
In
On Saturday 18 February 2012 17:03:59 Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
-.globl reset_cpu
+.type reset_cpu, %function
+.globalreset_cpu
Should we introduce a macro to deal with this rather than writing it
out each time? EXPORT()?
we have it
Hi Albert,
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:27 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.typefunc-name, %function
This marks the symbol as a function in the object
header which in turn helps the linker in some cases.
In particular
On Wednesday 15 February 2012 08:57:31 Aneesh V wrote:
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.type func-name, %function
This marks the symbol as a function in the object
header which in turn helps the linker in some cases.
In particular this was
This is done using the following directive preceding
each function definition:
.type func-name, %function
This marks the symbol as a function in the object
header which in turn helps the linker in some cases.
In particular this was found needed for resolving ARM/Thumb
calls correctly in a build
24 matches
Mail list logo
