I always used tftp in my test, so the first dm9000 on LP-8x4x was
always properly initialized. However, if the boot doesn't include
network related commands, linux will not find a valid MAC and will
complain.
No longer.
Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich
---
board/icpdas/lp8x4x/lp8x4x.c | 8 +++
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 06:41:58 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> I always used tftp in my test, so the first dm9000 on LP-8x4x was
> always properly initialized. However, if the boot doesn't include
> network related commands, linux will not find a valid MAC and will
> complain.
>
> No long
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 13:30 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 06:41:58 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > I always used tftp in my test, so the first dm9000 on LP-8x4x was
> > always properly initialized. However, if the boot doesn't include
> > network related commands, lin
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 04:39:00 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 13:30 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 06:41:58 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > > I always used tftp in my test, so the first dm9000 on LP-8x4x was
> > > always properly initi
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 18:12 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 04:39:00 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > I strongly believe the current way is easier.
>
> I disagree :)
>
> IF you set 'ethaddr' variable in U-Boot THEN
> U-Boot will patch this 'ethaddr' value into your D
On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 09:53:48 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 18:12 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 14, 2013 at 04:39:00 PM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > > I strongly believe the current way is easier.
> >
> > I disagree :)
> >
> > IF you set 'eth
On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 21:57 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > I don't think we need to support non-DT kernel. So we drop the
> > patch.
>
> OK, that's nice :)
It may even make sense to remove the code that initializes eth1, right?
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 12:53:18 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 21:57 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > I don't think we need to support non-DT kernel. So we drop the
> > > patch.
> >
> > OK, that's nice :)
>
> It may even make sense to remove the code that initializes e
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 06:17 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 12:53:18 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > It may even make sense to remove the code that initializes eth1, right?
>
> Which code?
I mean:
lp8x4x_eth1_mac_init() in board/icpdas/lp8x4x/lp8x4x.c
and its invocati
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 10:44:06 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 06:17 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 15, 2013 at 12:53:18 AM, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> > > It may even make sense to remove the code that initializes eth1, right?
> >
> > Which code?
>
>
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:05 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Heh, yes. The DT will solve it through the ethernet1 alias, just set the
> eth1addr and test it to make sure please.
It works. I've updated the dts in kernel for next version of patch
series.
I will update this patch for v2.
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
