Hi Mike,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
here's my [compile] tested change as the board i have with this part isnt
readily accessible atm ...
-mike
I've tested your changes, MAC register dumps works Ok. I needed to
make some changes to make it work,
On Thursday 12 November 2009 04:13:48 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
here's my [compile] tested change as the board i have with this part isnt
readily accessible atm ...
I've tested your changes, MAC register dumps works Ok. I needed to
make
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport m...@compulab.co.il
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c | 17 -
drivers/net/smc911x.h | 10 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
index 57ad806..9ff1288 100644
---
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.h
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *dev)
!(smc911x_reg_read(dev, PMT_CTRL) PMT_CTRL_READY))
udelay(10);
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.h
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *dev)
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h
+++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.h
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote:
--- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h
+++
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote:
It seems that eeprom code is broken since commit
736fead8fdbf8a8407048bebc373cd551d01ec98:
Hi Mike,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote:
It seems that eeprom code is broken since commit
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:45:10 Ben Warren wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote:
It seems that eeprom code is
Hi Mike,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:45:10 Ben Warren wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57
11 matches
Mail list logo