Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-12 Thread Mike Rapoport
Hi Mike, On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: here's my [compile] tested change as the board i have with this part isnt readily accessible atm ... -mike I've tested your changes, MAC register dumps works Ok. I needed to make some changes to make it work,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 12 November 2009 04:13:48 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: here's my [compile] tested change as the board i have with this part isnt readily accessible atm ... I've tested your changes, MAC register dumps works Ok. I needed to make

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Rapoport
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport m...@compulab.co.il --- drivers/net/smc911x.c | 17 - drivers/net/smc911x.h | 10 +- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c index 57ad806..9ff1288 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote: --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.h @@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *dev) !(smc911x_reg_read(dev, PMT_CTRL) PMT_CTRL_READY)) udelay(10);

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote: --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.h @@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct eth_device *dev)                      

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote: --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.h @@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 03:03:01 Mike Rapoport wrote: --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.h +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote: It seems that eeprom code is broken since commit 736fead8fdbf8a8407048bebc373cd551d01ec98:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Mike, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote: It seems that eeprom code is broken since commit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:45:10 Ben Warren wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57 Mike Rapoport wrote: It seems that eeprom code is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] smc911x: use dev-name in printfs

2009-11-11 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Mike, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:45:10 Ben Warren wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 17:24:27 Mike Rapoport wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 11 November 2009 16:56:57