Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree

2016-01-28 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 25 January 2016 at 17:42, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/25/2016 02:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >> On 01/25/2016 01:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> At present u-boot.bin holds the plain U-Boot binary without the device >>> tree. >>> This is somewhat annoying since you need eit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree

2016-01-25 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/25/2016 02:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 01/25/2016 01:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote: At present u-boot.bin holds the plain U-Boot binary without the device tree. This is somewhat annoying since you need either u-boot.bin or u-boot-dtb.bin depending on whether device tree is used. Adjust the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree

2016-01-25 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 25 January 2016 at 14:14, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/25/2016 01:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> At present u-boot.bin holds the plain U-Boot binary without the device >> tree. >> This is somewhat annoying since you need either u-boot.bin or >> u-boot-dtb.bin >> depending on whet

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree

2016-01-25 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/25/2016 01:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote: At present u-boot.bin holds the plain U-Boot binary without the device tree. This is somewhat annoying since you need either u-boot.bin or u-boot-dtb.bin depending on whether device tree is used. Adjust the build such that u-boot.bin includes a device t

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree

2016-01-25 Thread Simon Glass
At present u-boot.bin holds the plain U-Boot binary without the device tree. This is somewhat annoying since you need either u-boot.bin or u-boot-dtb.bin depending on whether device tree is used. Adjust the build such that u-boot.bin includes a device tree, and the plain binary is in u-boot-nodtb.