On Sep 22, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <1253307595-28655-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org
> > you wrote:
>> On CoreNet based platforms the LAW address is split between an high &
>> low register and we no longer shift the address. Also, the
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message <1253307595-28655-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org> you
wrote:
> On CoreNet based platforms the LAW address is split between an high &
> low register and we no longer shift the address. Also, the target IDs
> on CoreNet platforms have been completely re-assi
On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_CORENET
>> +volatile ccsr_local_t *ccm;
>> +volatile u32 *base, *lawbarh, *lawbarl, *lawar;
>> +
>> +ccm = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_CCM_ADDR);
>> +
>> +base = &(ccm->lawbarh
Scott Wood wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
>
>>> +base = &(ccm->lawbarh0);
>>>
>> Use in_be32(). Likewise in find_law.
>>
>
> Grr, ignore me. I just had my brain baked by an ISO9000 presentation.
>
>
You should always just go home after those things. Let someone else
drive, tho
Scott Wood wrote:
>> +base = &(ccm->lawbarh0);
>
> Use in_be32(). Likewise in find_law.
Grr, ignore me. I just had my brain baked by an ISO9000 presentation.
-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinf
Kumar Gala wrote:
> void set_law(u8 idx, phys_addr_t addr, enum law_size sz, enum law_trgt_if id)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_CORENET
> + volatile ccsr_local_t *ccm;
> + volatile u32 *base, *lawbarh, *lawbarl, *lawar;
We don't really need the volatile...
> void disable_law(u8 idx)
> {
>
On CoreNet based platforms the LAW address is split between an high &
low register and we no longer shift the address. Also, the target IDs
on CoreNet platforms have been completely re-assigned.
Additionally, added a new find_law() API to which LAW an address hits in.
This is need for the CoreNet
7 matches
Mail list logo
