The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
Since it's not an essential feature, disable it by default for ARCH_SUNXI
so that we get back some extra room for user customisations.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
> trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
>
> Since it's not an essential feature, disable it by default for ARCH_SUNXI
> so that we get back some e
On 10/19/2017 10:26 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
Since it's not an essential feature, disable it by default for ARCH_SUNXI
so that we get back some extra room for use
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:20AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
> > trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
> >
> > Since it's not an essentia
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:20AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
>> > trip across the size limit we'v
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:20AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Ripard
>>> wrote:
>>> > The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06:15AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:20AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >> > The EFI loader support takes around
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:51:04AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 10/19/2017 10:26 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
> > trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
> >
> > Since it's not an essential feature,
> From: Maxime Ripard
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:26:49 +0200
>
> The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
> trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
>
> Since it's not an essential feature, disable it by default for ARCH_SUNXI
> so that we get
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:12:36AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:20AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxi
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 01:39:28PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Maxime Ripard
> > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:26:49 +0200
> >
> > The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
> > trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
> >
> > Since it's no
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:51:04AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
> > index d2b6327119b4..a80a914b2fe8 100644
> > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:26:49AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
> trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
>
> Since it's not an essential feature, disable it by default for ARCH_SUNXI
> so that we get b
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:12:36AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Peter Robinson
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 09:43:20AM +0100,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:12:36AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Peter Robinson
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Maxi
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:12:36AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Peter Robinso
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:27:36PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Maxime Ripard
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:12:36AM +0100,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:27:36PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Ma
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:27:36PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:40:20PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:54:43AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >> > If it's a false one, then I guess Red Hat doesn't have any kind of
> > > >> > custom defconfigs for Fedora or RHEL for the kernel?
> > > >>
> > > >> kernel is part of the distro, "firmware" (ie. u-boot or whatever
> > > >> impleme
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 06:39:18PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:54:43AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > >> > If it's a false one, then I guess Red Hat doesn't have any kind of
> > > > >> > custom defconfigs for Fedora or RHEL for the kernel?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> kernel i
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 08:54:43AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > > >> > If it's a false one, then I guess Red Hat doesn't have any kind of
>> > > >> > custom defconfigs for Fedora or RHEL for the kernel?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> kernel is part of th
On 10/19/2017 10:43 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>> The EFI loader support takes around 31kB on an ARMv7 board, which makes us
>> trip across the size limit we've had on the U-Boot binary.
>>
>> Since it's not an essential feature, disable it
23 matches
Mail list logo