Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> > Such testing can be done anywhere, in some test branch. I don't think
> > mainline is the right place for such an intrusive and experiemental
> > feature.
>
> Do you have such a branch where you can apply this?
But I'm have no plans to test
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/18 22:25:04:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, finally you make sense to me. I actually tested this with mainline
> > on my board so it is not completely untested in mainline.
>
> As your board itself is not in mainline this _i
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:39:23 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote on 2011/01/18 21:24:16:
> > I don't see why MPC8xx's MMU couldn't be used for this, although it
> > might be a tight fit if you want to get everything into the pinned TLB
> > entries.
>
> I think it is harder that tha
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> Ah, finally you make sense to me. I actually tested this with mainline
> on my board so it is not completely untested in mainline.
As your board itself is not in mainline this _is_ completely untested
for mainline.
> > It's a nice and appreciat
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <20110118142416.5892c...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>
> > If we are talking about _all_ boards we have to keep a wider view.
> > For example, on MPC8xx there are not BATs. Not to mention other
> > architectures.
>
> I don't see why MPC8xx's MMU couldn't
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/18 21:06:34:
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > > You don't need to make the MMU trick work on all boards, just your board
> > > (or cpu family), because it wouldn't be imposing anything on
> > > the rest of the system. Do we actually
Scott Wood wrote on 2011/01/18 21:24:16:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:06:34 +0100
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> > Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
> >
> > In message
> >
> > you wrote:
> > > boards which I don't think is possible. I do think my approach comes
> > > closest though.
> > > I did try BATs but I d
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:06:34 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> > boards which I don't think is possible. I do think my approach comes
> > closest though.
> > I did try BATs but I didn't get very far.
What problems did you run into?
>
> If
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> > You don't need to make the MMU trick work on all boards, just your board
> > (or cpu family), because it wouldn't be imposing anything on
> > the rest of the system. Do we actually have someone who
> > needs this feature on a board without a s
Scott Wood wrote on 2011/01/18 18:27:49:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:18:34 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > How do you think a solution for all boards would look like?
> > The only other method is can think of is some MMU trickery and
> > I don't even see how you can make that work on all board
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:18:34 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> How do you think a solution for all boards would look like?
> The only other method is can think of is some MMU trickery and
> I don't even see how you can make that work on all boards and
You don't need to make the MMU trick work on a
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/18 00:42:10:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > No other board is broken. This new function is neutral to other boards.
>
> Well, I see this differntly.
>
> > Wolfgang, once you indicated you were interested in such feature as I have
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> No other board is broken. This new function is neutral to other boards.
Well, I see this differntly.
> Wolfgang, once you indicated you were interested in such feature as I have
> added but my first impl. had LINK_OFF calls all over the place,
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/17 23:11:59:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message
> you
> wrote:
> >
> > > > It would break only if link address != load address. That is, if you
> > > > want to use my new CONFIG_SYS_TRUE_PIC feature and be able to load
> > > > u-boot at any address regardle
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
you
wrote:
>
> > > It would break only if link address != load address. That is, if you
> > > want to use my new CONFIG_SYS_TRUE_PIC feature and be able to load
> > > u-boot at any address regardless of link address you would
> > > have to add LINK_OFF calls in
Scott Wood wrote on 2011/01/10 19:24:02:
>
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:48:47 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/09 21:29:04:
> > >
> > > Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
> > >
> > > In message
> > > <1292838435-14958-4-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> you
> > >
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 21:48:47 +0100
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/09 21:29:04:
> >
> > Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
> >
> > In message
> > <1292838435-14958-4-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> you wrote:
> > > Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc83
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2011/01/09 21:29:04:
>
> Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
>
> In message <1292838435-14958-4-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se>
> you wrote:
> > Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc8321 based
> > board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
> > ---
> >
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message <1292838435-14958-4-git-send-email-joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se>
you wrote:
> Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc8321 based
> board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
> ---
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |2 +-
> arch/powerpc/lib
Only these 2 call sites depends on fixups for my mpc8321 based
board.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c |2 +-
arch/powerpc/lib/board.c|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init
20 matches
Mail list logo
