Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] net: gmac_rockchip: Add support for the RK3399 GMAC

2017-04-01 Thread Simon Glass
On 26 March 2017 at 07:52, Joe Hershberger wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> On 25 March 2017 at 13:09, Joe Hershberger wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Philipp Tomsich >>> wrote: The GMAC in the RK3399 is very similar to the RK3288 variant (i.e. i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] net: gmac_rockchip: Add support for the RK3399 GMAC

2017-03-26 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > On 25 March 2017 at 13:09, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Philipp Tomsich >> wrote: >>> The GMAC in the RK3399 is very similar to the RK3288 variant (i.e. it >>> is a Designware GMAC core and requires similar conf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] net: gmac_rockchip: Add support for the RK3399 GMAC

2017-03-25 Thread Simon Glass
On 25 March 2017 at 13:09, Joe Hershberger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Philipp Tomsich > wrote: >> The GMAC in the RK3399 is very similar to the RK3288 variant (i.e. it >> is a Designware GMAC core and requires similar configuration as the >> RK3288 to switch it to RGMII and set up

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] net: gmac_rockchip: Add support for the RK3399 GMAC

2017-03-25 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote: > The GMAC in the RK3399 is very similar to the RK3288 variant (i.e. it > is a Designware GMAC core and requires similar configuration as the > RK3288 to switch it to RGMII and set up the TX/RX delays for Gigabit). > The key difference is tha

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] net: gmac_rockchip: Add support for the RK3399 GMAC

2017-03-24 Thread Philipp Tomsich
The GMAC in the RK3399 is very similar to the RK3288 variant (i.e. it is a Designware GMAC core and requires similar configuration as the RK3288 to switch it to RGMII and set up the TX/RX delays for Gigabit). The key difference is that the register offsets (within the GRF block) and bit-offsets (wi