On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 20:12 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear York Sun,
>
> In message <1314378058.20734.25.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
> >
> > I am going to follow the style and not to add new typedefs. For the
> > existing typedef, I will keep using them. In this case, it is an
> > existing typ
Dear York Sun,
In message <1314378058.20734.25.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
>
> I am going to follow the style and not to add new typedefs. For the
> existing typedef, I will keep using them. In this case, it is an
> existing typedef, just for another platform. Fixing it alone will cause
> more tro
Wolfgang,
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 00:31 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear York Sun,
>
> In message <1314308192.29220.29.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
> >
> > I am introducing it to this file as it is already being used somewhere
> > else. If you are trying to enforce this new policy, please start wi
Dear York Sun,
In message <1314308192.29220.29.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
>
> I am introducing it to this file as it is already being used somewhere
> else. If you are trying to enforce this new policy, please start with
> brand new files/typedefs, as you pointed out in my another patch. I will
>
Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:30 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear York Sun,
>
> In message <1314307500.29220.24.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
> >
> > Fixing all existing reference to ccs_ddr is a lot of work, comparing
> > with defining it for 83xx. There are many other typedefs in the very
>
Dear York Sun,
In message <1314307500.29220.24.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
>
> Fixing all existing reference to ccs_ddr is a lot of work, comparing
> with defining it for 83xx. There are many other typedefs in the very
> same files. Would we fix all of them? I don't think so. The bottom of
well, i
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:20 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear York Sun,
>
> In message <1314305821.29220.21.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
> >
> > > WARNING: do not add new typedefs
> > > #408: FILE: arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_83xx.h:289:
> > > +typedef struct ccsr_ddr {
> > >
> > > Please fix.
Dear York Sun,
In message <1314305821.29220.21.camel@oslab-l1> you wrote:
>
> > WARNING: do not add new typedefs
> > #408: FILE: arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_83xx.h:289:
> > +typedef struct ccsr_ddr {
> >
> > Please fix.
>
> I can fix the new tyepdef. But this one isn't. It has been used for
Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 00:36 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear York Sun,
>
> In message <1312923045-2612-5-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com> you wrote:
> > Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
> > fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for
Dear York Sun,
In message <1312923045-2612-5-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com> you wrote:
> Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
> fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for MPC83xx takes advantage of
> overall improvement. It requires changes for boa
Unified DDR driver is maintained for better performance, robustness and bug
fixes. Upgrading to use unified DDR driver for MPC83xx takes advantage of
overall improvement. It requires changes for board files to customize
platform-dependent parameters.
To utilize the unified DDR driver, a board need
11 matches
Mail list logo
