On 10/30/2012 06:44 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 13:33 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> Dear Lucas Stach,
>>
>> [...]
>>
> -static int add_port(struct fdt_usb *config)
Fix the comment instead of removing it?
>>>
>>> I don't think that this comment
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 06:48 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 06:27 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
>> >> Hi Lucas,
>> >>
>> >> On T
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 06:48 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 06:27 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
> >> Hi Lucas,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >> > There is no need
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 06:27 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
>> Hi Lucas,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> > There is no need to init a USB controller before the upper layers indicate
>> > that they are
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 06:27 -0700 schrieb Simon Glass:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > There is no need to init a USB controller before the upper layers indicate
> > that they are actually going to use it.
> >
> > board_usb_init now only parses the d
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> There is no need to init a USB controller before the upper layers indicate
> that they are actually going to use it.
>
> board_usb_init now only parses the device tree and sets up the common pll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach
> ---
Hi Marek,
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 13:33 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> Dear Lucas Stach,
>
> [...]
>
> > > > -static int add_port(struct fdt_usb *config)
> > >
> > > Fix the comment instead of removing it?
> >
> > I don't think that this comment adds any real value. The whole function
> > w
Dear Lucas Stach,
[...]
> > > -static int add_port(struct fdt_usb *config)
> >
> > Fix the comment instead of removing it?
>
> I don't think that this comment adds any real value. The whole function
> which this comment refers to is removed and it's content split between
> board_usb_init and eh
Hello Marek,
Am Dienstag, den 30.10.2012, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> Dear Lucas Stach,
>
> > There is no need to init a USB controller before the upper layers indicate
> > that they are actually going to use it.
> >
> > board_usb_init now only parses the device tree and sets up the commo
Dear Lucas Stach,
> There is no need to init a USB controller before the upper layers indicate
> that they are actually going to use it.
>
> board_usb_init now only parses the device tree and sets up the common pll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/usb.c | 47
>
There is no need to init a USB controller before the upper layers indicate
that they are actually going to use it.
board_usb_init now only parses the device tree and sets up the common pll.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/tegra20/usb.c | 47 +++-
11 matches
Mail list logo