On 23.02.19 02:10, André Przywara wrote:
> On 22/02/2019 08:06, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21.02.19 02:30, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> Even though we introduced FIT image support for the SPL to cover the
>>> 64-bit SoCs, there is no technical limitation to those parts.
>>>
>>> Change the Mak
On 22/02/2019 08:06, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 21.02.19 02:30, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Even though we introduced FIT image support for the SPL to cover the
>> 64-bit SoCs, there is no technical limitation to those parts.
>>
>> Change the Makefile stanza to always create a FIT image if the
>
On 21.02.19 02:30, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Even though we introduced FIT image support for the SPL to cover the
> 64-bit SoCs, there is no technical limitation to those parts.
>
> Change the Makefile stanza to always create a FIT image if the
> particular config either provided a script or an .i
Even though we introduced FIT image support for the SPL to cover the
64-bit SoCs, there is no technical limitation to those parts.
Change the Makefile stanza to always create a FIT image if the
particular config either provided a script or an .its file.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara
---
Makefil
4 matches
Mail list logo