On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:50 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> Any reason to just not move QE init for everyone?
> >>
> > That was based on Wolfgang's comment:
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-August/075657.html
> >
> > Haiying
> >
>
> I think wolfgang's gripe is about putting the code in
On Dec 1, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Haiying Wang wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 08:56 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
>>> index 4b8faa5..eb34378 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powe
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 08:56 -0700, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > index 4b8faa5..eb34378 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ int
On Dec 1, 2010, at 9:50 AM,
wrote:
> From: Haiying Wang
>
> For some board which doesn't have NOR flash and the QE's firmware(ucode) is
> saved in its NAND flash, we don't want call qe_init in cpu_init_r, but will
> call it later after nand is initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang
>
From: Haiying Wang
For some board which doesn't have NOR flash and the QE's firmware(ucode) is
saved in its NAND flash, we don't want call qe_init in cpu_init_r, but will
call it later after nand is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c |2 +-
1 f
5 matches
Mail list logo
