New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
Cc: Heiko Schocher
---
Changes since V1:
- add a weak function i2c_set_bus_num() to cmd_i2c.c instead of adding a
dummy function to mxc_i2c.c. (Heiko Schocher)
common/cmd_i2c.c |8
1 files changed, 8 inser
Hello Stefano,
Stefano Babic wrote:
> New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> Cc: Heiko Schocher
> ---
> Changes since V1:
>
> - add a weak function i2c_set_bus_num() to cmd_i2c.c instead of adding a
> dummy function to mxc_i2c.c. (Heiko Schocher)
>
>
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> Cc: Heiko Schocher
I would prefer to see a new set of I2C functions that take a bus
number as a parameter, so that we can eliminate i2c_set_bus_num() (and
the
On Monday 10 October 2011 13:53:48 Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> > Cc: Heiko Schocher
>
> I would prefer to see a new set of I2C functions that take a bus
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i think that'd require a much larger rework of the framework and thus would
> be
> better to do in addition to Stefano's work rather than in place of ?
Hmmm... I guess it would be easier to do the rework eventually if
i2c_set_bus_num() is universal, instead of just for Po
Hello Tabi,
Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
>> Cc: Heiko Schocher
>
> I would prefer to see a new set of I2C functions that take a bus
> number as a parameter, s
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message <4e93d634.6080...@denx.de> you wrote:
>
> Then please have a look at:
>
> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-i2c.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multibus_v2
>
> It is a complete i2c rework with adding multiadapter/multibus
> to the i2c framework (and a i2c_core.c) .
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:48:07 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>
> In message <4e93d634.6080...@denx.de> you wrote:
> > Then please have a look at:
> >
> > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-i2c.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multi
> > bus_v2
> >
> > It is a complete i2c rewor
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heiko Schocher,
>
> In message <4e93d634.6080...@denx.de> you wrote:
>> Then please have a look at:
>>
>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-i2c.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/multibus_v2
>>
>> It is a complete i2c rework with adding multiadapter/multibus
On 10/10/2011 08:26 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 10 October 2011 13:53:48 Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>>> New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
>>> Cc: Heiko Schocher
>>
>> I would prefer
10 matches
Mail list logo