Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] i.MX6: Correct ANATOP_PFD (Phase Fractional Divider) register declarations

On 29/08/2013 21:37, Eric Nelson wrote: > Some _CLKGATE_MASK and _FRAC_MASK macros were wrong for PFD_480 > and the PFD_528 macros were missing. > > Fortunately, the incorrect macros weren't being used. > > Since both the PFD_480 and PFD_528 registers have the same > structure, and the fields are

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] i.MX6: Correct ANATOP_PFD (Phase Fractional Divider) register declarations

Some _CLKGATE_MASK and _FRAC_MASK macros were wrong for PFD_480 and the PFD_528 macros were missing. Fortunately, the incorrect macros weren't being used. Since both the PFD_480 and PFD_528 registers have the same structure, and the fields are identical for [0..3] in bytes [0..3], so a single set