Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/4] drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework

On 21:46-20150901, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Simon, Apologies on a delayed response. [...] > > Changes in V2: > > - review comments incorporated from v1 > > Ah yes, but which ones?! Hopefully all of them - I'd normally list up the details, but the changes were a little too many in the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/4] drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework

Hi Nishanth, On 27 August 2015 at 22:07, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors > on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized > functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors. >

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/4] drivers: Introduce a simplified remoteproc framework

Many System on Chip(SoC) solutions are complex with multiple processors on the same die dedicated to either general purpose of specialized functions. Many examples do exist in today's SoCs from various vendors. Typical examples are micro controllers such as an ARM M3/M0 doing a offload of specific