Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/4] Don't compile in large memory test function by default.

On 04/08/2011 12:14, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4e3a3cb8.2030...@aribaud.net> you wrote: >> >>> I didn't receive comments on this one. By not compiling this by >>> default it removes a couple of #defines people need to think >>> about. Also, I'm guessing the memory

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/4] Don't compile in large memory test function by default.

Dear Christopher Harvey, In message <20110707143109.gc5...@harvey-pc.matrox.com> you wrote: > > I didn't receive comments on this one. By not compiling this by > default it removes a couple of #defines people need to think > about. Also, I'm guessing the memory test isn't used very much, so > thi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/4] Don't compile in large memory test function by default.

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4e3a3cb8.2030...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > > I didn't receive comments on this one. By not compiling this by > > default it removes a couple of #defines people need to think > > about. Also, I'm guessing the memory test isn't used very much, so > > this makes u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/4] Don't compile in large memory test function by default.

Hi Christopher, Le 07/07/2011 16:31, Christopher Harvey a écrit : > Signed-off-by: Christopher Harvey > --- > > V2: > I didn't receive comments on this one. By not compiling this by > default it removes a couple of #defines people need to think > about. Also, I'm guessing the memory test isn't us

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/4] Don't compile in large memory test function by default.

Signed-off-by: Christopher Harvey --- V2: I didn't receive comments on this one. By not compiling this by default it removes a couple of #defines people need to think about. Also, I'm guessing the memory test isn't used very much, so this makes u-boot a bit smaller. common/cmd_mem.c |5 +++