On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:12:33AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 11:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:55:13PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >
> >> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
> >> PL310 control register, however, that is so
On 03/03/2015 11:12 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/03/2015 11:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:55:13PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>>> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
>>> PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:55:13PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
> PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
> enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of processors as well. The
> only difference being the
On 03/03/2015 11:08 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:55:13PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
>> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
>> PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
>> enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of proce
set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of processors as well. The
only difference being the service being invoked for the function.
So, convert the service to a mac
5 matches
Mail list logo
