On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:49:05AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 03/05/2015 08:00 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> >> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to se
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:49:05AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 08:00 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
> >> PL310 control register, however, that is some
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:49:05AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/05/2015 08:00 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
> >> PL310 control register, however, that is some
On 03/05/2015 08:00 AM, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
>> PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
>> enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of proce
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:26:22PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
> PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
> enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of processors as well. The only
> difference being the s
set_pl310_ctrl_reg does use the Secure Monitor Call (SMC) to setup
PL310 control register, however, that is something that is generic
enough to be used for OMAP5 generation of processors as well. The only
difference being the service being invoked for the function.
So, convert the service to a mac
6 matches
Mail list logo