Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 3/3] sunxi: Kconfig: Make SPL_FEL a toplevel Kconfig option

2014-10-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/06/2014 10:28 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 09:58 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> With the 2 FEL defconfigs completely removed. If you disagree with removing >> them, >> this is going to need some more discussion :) > > I think they should be removed but in a separate

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 3/3] sunxi: Kconfig: Make SPL_FEL a toplevel Kconfig option

2014-10-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 09:58 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > With the 2 FEL defconfigs completely removed. If you disagree with removing > them, > this is going to need some more discussion :) I think they should be removed but in a separate patch, rather than mixing two changes in this one. I'll ad

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 3/3] sunxi: Kconfig: Make SPL_FEL a toplevel Kconfig option

2014-10-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 10/04/2014 10:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > It's unfortunate that this needs to be present in both .config and spl/.config > since it makes it slightly hard to enable FEL mode for a regular defconfig. It > can be done with: > echo CONFIG_SPL_FEL=y >> .config > echo CONFIG_SPL_FEL=y >

[U-Boot] [PATCH for-next 3/3] sunxi: Kconfig: Make SPL_FEL a toplevel Kconfig option

2014-10-04 Thread Ian Campbell
It's unfortunate that this needs to be present in both .config and spl/.config since it makes it slightly hard to enable FEL mode for a regular defconfig. It can be done with: echo CONFIG_SPL_FEL=y >> .config echo CONFIG_SPL_FEL=y >> spl/.config Ideally only one of those would be needed.