From: David Brownell
Start updating DaVinci board support to reduce dependencies on
dm644x chips and EVM-like boards ... beginning with "psc.c",
which hosts a bunch of those dependencies:
- Pinmux registers and their contents are SoC-specific, and
are also unrelated to the Power and Sleep Co
On 15:44 Sun 12 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
> From: David Brownell
>
> Start updating DaVinci board support to reduce dependencies on
> dm644x chips and EVM-like boards ... beginning with "psc.c",
> which hosts a bunch of those dependencies:
>
> - Pinmux registers and their contents are SoC
On Thursday 16 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 15:44 Sun 12 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
> could you split it in more logical change please
I'll fragment it a bit more, ok. later.
> > @@ -129,10 +122,12 @@ void davinci_enable_uart0(void)
> > lpsc_on(DAVINCI_LPSC
On 23:31 Thu 16 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 15:44 Sun 12 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
>
> > could you split it in more logical change please
>
> I'll fragment it a bit more, ok. later.
>
>
> > > @@ -129,10 +122,
On Friday 17 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>
> > > could you split it in more logical change please
> >
> > I'll fragment it a bit more, ok. later.
Re-worked version coming in X parts, which also include a
patch changing the cpu/arm926ejs/davinci directory to use
the condi
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:31:12 -0700
David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 15:44 Sun 12 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
>
> > could you split it in more logical change please
>
> I'll fragment it a bit more, ok. later.
>
>
> > > @@ -1
On Friday 24 April 2009, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> I would suggest renaming (or adding) CONFIG_SOC_DM6446
> to CONFIG_SOC_DM644x
The updated patchset I sent includes CONFIG_SOC_DM644X:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051051.html
I decided to keep the "X" uppercase for consisten
On 12:33 Fri 24 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 24 April 2009, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > I would suggest renaming (or adding) CONFIG_SOC_DM6446
> > to CONFIG_SOC_DM644x
>
> The updated patchset I sent includes CONFIG_SOC_DM644X:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/
On Friday 24 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 12:33 Fri 24 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
> >
> > (Note: that series of five patches goes with two
> > patches which seem not to have merged yet:
> >
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050802.html
> the P
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 12:33 Fri 24 Apr , David Brownell wrote:
>
>> On Friday 24 April 2009, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>>
>>> I would suggest renaming (or adding) CONFIG_SOC_DM6446
>>> to CONFIG_SOC_DM644x
>>>
>> The updated patchset I sent includes CONFIG_SOC
On Friday 24 April 2009, Ben Warren wrote:
>
> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050800.html
> >>
> > this is throw Ben tree
> >
> >
> Actually, I asked you to pick it up:
>
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051076.html
>
> If that's a problem let me
11 matches
Mail list logo